I've picked up an old Powerbook 1400 from eBay, for £65. It's missing a floppy drive / CD-ROM drive, so it's going to be a bit of a challenge getting data in and out of it. I think perhaps at my Dad's house there's a HDI-30 to SCSI converter, but failing that, I can use AppleTalk between my Performa 400 and the Powerbook 1400 or maybe simple serial transfer.
The PowerBook 1400 in question is the PowerPC 603e, 117MHz model without a level 2 cache. So, it's slow. But how slow, is the big question. I tried to find out from LowEndMac. It gave the performance as
"Performance: 114/137/152 (117/133/166 MHz), MacBench 4 (also 42,076 (117 MHz) Whetstones)"
But when I tried to compare it with other Macs of the era on LowEndMac, particularly the Performa 5200, they all provided benchmarks for different test suites. The 6100/60 was given relative to MacBench 5, MacBench 2 and Speedometer 4. Performa 5200 was just xxx relative to a Mac SE. And so forth.
However, a little while later I came across this reddit page:
https://www.reddit.com/r/VintageApple/comments/q4rg86/performa_620075_benchmarks_compared_to_other_macs/
And it gave a screenshot of a bunch of early PowerPC Macs (and a Quadra 630) benchmarks for MacBench 4!!! Here's the data as a simple table:
Model | CPU | FPU | Disk | Mean* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quadra 630 | 35 | 7 | 73 | 26 |
Performa 6200/75(SCSI) | 93 | 95 | 94 | 94 |
Performa 6200/75(IDE) | 93 | 95 | 121 | 102 |
PowerMac 6100/60 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
PowerMac 7200/75 | 102 | 117 | 107 | 108 |
PowerBook 1400/117 | 124 | 143 | 92 | 118 |
PowerMac 8100/80 | 142 | 138 | 132 | 137 |
Performa 6320/120 | 134 | 148 | 161 | 147 |
PowerMac 7500/100 | 162 | 164 | 164 | 163 |
PowerMac 7200/120 | 174 | 202 | 191 | 189 |
Performa 6400/180 | 184 | 207 | 123 | 167 |
Performa 6400/200 | 258 | 262 | 163 | 223 |
PowerMac 7600/132 | 251 | 243 | 212 | 235 |
No comments:
Post a Comment